New · Cohort 4AI-Powered Data Engineering Cohort 4 goes live 26 September · only 40 seatsRegister Now
System Design Mock

System Design Mock Interview for APIs, Scale, and Tradeoffs

Practice system design interviews with APIs, data models, services, scalability, reliability, tradeoffs, and architecture explanations.

system-design-mock/live

How System Design Mock works

1Choose system design round
2Clarify requirements
3Design APIs and data
4Review tradeoffs and feedback

What you get

System Design Mock

Free system design mock: architecture prompts, API and database design, scaling tradeoffs — reasoned aloud, scored honestly by AI. Practice before it counts.

API design

01

Data models

02

Scaling tradeoffs

03

Architecture feedback

04

Why you can trust it

Built to do the work, not just describe it

Everything below is what the tool actually does — with clear limits, guardrails, and the next step always visible.

API design

Checks whether the candidate can define clean endpoints, contracts, and boundaries.

Data models

Reviews database choices, entities, relationships, and access patterns.

Scaling tradeoffs

Pushes candidates to reason about latency, throughput, cache, queues, and reliability.

Architecture feedback

Scores clarity, completeness, tradeoff depth, and follow-up readiness.

How it works

The shortest path from intent to action

Each step below is what actually happens, in order — so you always know what comes next.

  1. 01

    Choose system design round

  2. 02

    Clarify requirements

  3. 03

    Design APIs and data

  4. 04

    Review tradeoffs and feedback

Deep dive

What this workspace improves

A closer look at what this workspace does — and how each part helps you move faster.

Practice architecture with structure

The mock keeps the candidate focused on requirements, APIs, data, services, scale, and failure cases.

Requirements framing
Service boundaries
Bottleneck analysis

Improve explanation quality

System design interviews are judged on communication and tradeoffs, so feedback focuses on clarity as much as diagrams.

Tradeoff language
Follow-up defense
Risk and reliability notes

How do you design a URL shortener in an interview?

Start with requirements: create a short code for a long URL, redirect quickly, handle high read volume. Define the API (POST /shorten, GET /{code}). For the data model, store code, long URL, owner, and created-at, keyed by a base62 code generated from a counter or hash. Reads dominate, so cache hot codes and put the redirect path behind a CDN. This single example covers API design, data modelling, read/write skew, and caching in one story.

API: POST /shorten, GET /{code}
Base62 code from a counter or hash, collision check
Read-heavy, so cache hot codes and use a CDN

How do you design a rate limiter?

Clarify the limit (for example 100 requests per minute per user) and where it lives (gateway vs service). The token-bucket algorithm refills tokens at a fixed rate and rejects when empty; the sliding-window-counter variant is more accurate at boundaries. Store counters in Redis with a TTL so they expire automatically. Naming the algorithm and the storage tradeoff is exactly the depth interviewers reward.

Token bucket vs sliding window counter
Counters in Redis with TTL, atomic increments
Decide gateway-level vs per-service enforcement

What order should you follow in a system design interview?

A reliable order is: clarify requirements and constraints, estimate scale, define the API, design the data model, draw the high-level architecture, then go deep on one or two components and their tradeoffs. Interviewers grade structure heavily, and jumping straight to boxes and arrows without requirements is the most common reason strong engineers still fail this round.

Requirements and constraints first
Estimate, then API, then data, then high-level design
Go deep on one component, not shallow on ten

How do you do back-of-the-envelope capacity estimation?

You do not need exact numbers, you need defensible ones. Convert daily active users and actions per user into requests per second, then into storage and bandwidth. For example, 10 million writes a day is roughly 115 writes per second average, with peaks several times higher. Showing you can size the system tells the interviewer your design is grounded, not hand-waved.

DAU times actions gives requests per day
Divide by 86,400 for average requests per second
Plan for peak as a multiple of the average

Tradeoffs you should name out loud

Senior signal comes from naming tradeoffs before the interviewer asks. SQL versus NoSQL, strong versus eventual consistency, sync versus async processing, and cache invalidation are the recurring forks. There is rarely a single right answer; the score comes from justifying your choice against the stated requirements.

SQL vs NoSQL, consistency vs availability
Sync request path vs async queue and workers
Cache strategy and how you invalidate it

Role-aware system design

Backend and full-stack candidates get classic service-and-scale prompts, data engineers get pipeline, warehouse, and streaming designs, and platform or cloud roles get reliability and infrastructure questions. PrepNPlaced can steer the mock toward the flavour your interview will actually use so the practice transfers directly.

Backend: services, APIs, scaling, reliability
Data: batch and streaming pipelines, warehousing
Match the prompt type to your target role

Questions

Common questions

Straight answers to the questions people ask most before getting started.

Is this only for senior engineers?

No. It can help backend, full-stack, data, cloud, and experienced candidates practice the level expected for their role.

Does it cover databases and scaling?

Yes. The practice flow can cover data models, indexing, cache, queues, consistency, and reliability.

Can I practice explaining my architecture?

Yes. The mock focuses on explanation quality, tradeoffs, and interviewer-style follow-ups.

Next workflow

Continue inside your PrepNPlaced dashboard

Keep moving through the connected workflow without losing the target role context.

API design

Data models

Scaling tradeoffs

Architecture feedback