API design
Checks whether the candidate can define clean endpoints, contracts, and boundaries.
Practice system design interviews with APIs, data models, services, scalability, reliability, tradeoffs, and architecture explanations.
How System Design Mock works
What you get
Free system design mock: architecture prompts, API and database design, scaling tradeoffs — reasoned aloud, scored honestly by AI. Practice before it counts.
API design
01Data models
02Scaling tradeoffs
03Architecture feedback
04Why you can trust it
Everything below is what the tool actually does — with clear limits, guardrails, and the next step always visible.
Checks whether the candidate can define clean endpoints, contracts, and boundaries.
Reviews database choices, entities, relationships, and access patterns.
Pushes candidates to reason about latency, throughput, cache, queues, and reliability.
Scores clarity, completeness, tradeoff depth, and follow-up readiness.
How it works
Each step below is what actually happens, in order — so you always know what comes next.
Choose system design round
Clarify requirements
Design APIs and data
Review tradeoffs and feedback
Deep dive
A closer look at what this workspace does — and how each part helps you move faster.
The mock keeps the candidate focused on requirements, APIs, data, services, scale, and failure cases.
System design interviews are judged on communication and tradeoffs, so feedback focuses on clarity as much as diagrams.
Start with requirements: create a short code for a long URL, redirect quickly, handle high read volume. Define the API (POST /shorten, GET /{code}). For the data model, store code, long URL, owner, and created-at, keyed by a base62 code generated from a counter or hash. Reads dominate, so cache hot codes and put the redirect path behind a CDN. This single example covers API design, data modelling, read/write skew, and caching in one story.
Clarify the limit (for example 100 requests per minute per user) and where it lives (gateway vs service). The token-bucket algorithm refills tokens at a fixed rate and rejects when empty; the sliding-window-counter variant is more accurate at boundaries. Store counters in Redis with a TTL so they expire automatically. Naming the algorithm and the storage tradeoff is exactly the depth interviewers reward.
A reliable order is: clarify requirements and constraints, estimate scale, define the API, design the data model, draw the high-level architecture, then go deep on one or two components and their tradeoffs. Interviewers grade structure heavily, and jumping straight to boxes and arrows without requirements is the most common reason strong engineers still fail this round.
You do not need exact numbers, you need defensible ones. Convert daily active users and actions per user into requests per second, then into storage and bandwidth. For example, 10 million writes a day is roughly 115 writes per second average, with peaks several times higher. Showing you can size the system tells the interviewer your design is grounded, not hand-waved.
Senior signal comes from naming tradeoffs before the interviewer asks. SQL versus NoSQL, strong versus eventual consistency, sync versus async processing, and cache invalidation are the recurring forks. There is rarely a single right answer; the score comes from justifying your choice against the stated requirements.
Backend and full-stack candidates get classic service-and-scale prompts, data engineers get pipeline, warehouse, and streaming designs, and platform or cloud roles get reliability and infrastructure questions. PrepNPlaced can steer the mock toward the flavour your interview will actually use so the practice transfers directly.
Questions
Straight answers to the questions people ask most before getting started.
No. It can help backend, full-stack, data, cloud, and experienced candidates practice the level expected for their role.
Yes. The practice flow can cover data models, indexing, cache, queues, consistency, and reliability.
Yes. The mock focuses on explanation quality, tradeoffs, and interviewer-style follow-ups.
Next workflow
Keep moving through the connected workflow without losing the target role context.
API design
Data models
Scaling tradeoffs
Architecture feedback