Fujitsu
3,030 verified employee reviews
Rated above the IT Services & Consulting average of 3.55 — strong on work-life balance, weaker on career growth.
Data refreshed 2026-07-13 · nightly pipeline
How employees rate Fujitsu
scale 0–5▲ industry avg 3.55
Should you join?
- ✓Work-life balance (4.07) and Company culture (3.76) are its best-rated categories.
- !Career growth (3.00) is the weakest signal in employee reviews.
- ≈Overall 3.79 vs the IT Services & Consulting average of 3.55.
How Fujitsu compares
Top 38%
of 3,161 rated companies
#108 of 378
in IT Services & Consulting
vs the average across all 3,161 rated companies
Hiring right now
Live9
open data roles in our job pool · 6 new this week
Real interview signal
Questions candidates reported after interviewing at Fujitsu · roles as reported.
214
Interview experiences
107
Questions reported
Assistant Technical Service Engineer
What are CRL and OCSP, and what are their differences?
✦ Get AI answer••••••••••••••••••
3+ more Fujitsu questions + AI answers for every one
Start Free★ Employee portal
Worked at Fujitsu? Rate it.
Help 4 lakh+ job seekers see the real picture. Anonymous by default.
✦ Be among the first to review a company on PrepNPlaced
1 · Which company?
2 · Rate the categories
3 · Your experience
4 · Stay anonymous
Goes live after moderation, usually within 24h.
🎁 Your first review unlocks 3 bonus interview questions.
Company facts
Fujitsu makes the world more sustainable by building trust in society through innovation.
- CEO
- Takahito Tokita
- Founded
- 1935
- Employees
- 10,552+
- In India
- 10552
- Type
- Private · IT Services & Consulting
Similar companies
This free snapshot
- ✓ 7 rating categories
- ✓ Industry benchmark
- ✓ Real interview questions
Your Company Game Plan · free account
- 🔒 Verdict for YOUR profile
- 🔒 Live Fujitsu openings
- 🔒 Full question bank + prep plan
Compare with similar IT Services & Consulting companies
Ratings combine verified public employee-review sources with reviews submitted on PrepNPlaced · refreshed nightly · Report incorrect data