Hapag Lloyd
773 verified employee reviews
Rated in line with the Ports & Shipping average of 3.85 — strong on job security, weaker on career growth.
Data refreshed 2026-08-16 · nightly pipeline
How employees rate Hapag Lloyd
scale 0–5▲ industry avg 3.85
Should you join?
- ✓Job security (3.90) and Company culture (3.81) are its best-rated categories.
- !Career growth (2.99) is the weakest signal in employee reviews.
- ≈Overall 3.82 vs the Ports & Shipping average of 3.85.
How Hapag Lloyd compares
Top 43%
of 22,751 rated companies
#29 of 50
in Ports & Shipping
vs the average across all 22,751 rated companies
Real interview signal
Questions candidates reported after interviewing at Hapag Lloyd · roles as reported.
31
Interview experiences
17
Questions reported
Software Engineer
What are the various mechanisms, apart from synchronized locks, to restrict multiple threads from making modifications in Java?
✦ Get AI answer••••••••••••••••••
1+ more Hapag Lloyd questions + AI answers for every one
Start Free★ Employee portal
Worked at Hapag Lloyd? Rate it.
Help 4 lakh+ job seekers see the real picture. Anonymous by default.
✓ 3 reviews submitted on PrepNPlaced
1 · Which company?
2 · Rate the categories
3 · Your experience
4 · Stay anonymous
Goes live after moderation, usually within 24h.
🎁 Your first review unlocks 3 bonus interview questions.
Company facts
A prominent global container shipping company, facilitating efficient transport solutions with a extensive fleet and a vast network of services connecting international ports.
- Founded
- 1847
- Employees
- 3,001+
- In India
- 3001
- Type
- Private · Ports & Shipping
Similar companies
This free snapshot
- ✓ 7 rating categories
- ✓ Industry benchmark
- ✓ Real interview questions
Your Company Game Plan · free account
- 🔒 Verdict for YOUR profile
- 🔒 Live Hapag Lloyd openings
- 🔒 Full question bank + prep plan
Compare with similar Ports & Shipping companies
Ratings combine verified public employee-review sources with reviews submitted on PrepNPlaced · refreshed nightly · Report incorrect data