Shadowfax
2,044 verified employee reviews
Rated below the Logistics average of 3.80 — strong on salary satisfaction, weaker on career growth.
Data refreshed 2026-07-13 · nightly pipeline
How employees rate Shadowfax
scale 0–5▲ industry avg 3.80
Should you join?
- ✓Salary satisfaction (3.47) and Skill development (3.40) are its best-rated categories.
- !Career growth (3.06) is the weakest signal in employee reviews.
- ≈Overall 3.51 vs the Logistics average of 3.80.
How Shadowfax compares
Top 52%
of 3,161 rated companies
#14 of 16
in Logistics
vs the average across all 3,161 rated companies
Real interview signal
Questions candidates reported after interviewing at Shadowfax · roles as reported.
173
Interview experiences
72
Questions reported
HUB Incharge
How would you manage riders, rider hiring, and DC closure to achieve 0% loss, a 75% COD target, and a 100% prepaid target for cash handling?
✦ Get AI answer••••••••••••••••••
3+ more Shadowfax questions + AI answers for every one
Start Free★ Employee portal
Worked at Shadowfax? Rate it.
Help 4 lakh+ job seekers see the real picture. Anonymous by default.
✦ Be among the first to review a company on PrepNPlaced
1 · Which company?
2 · Rate the categories
3 · Your experience
4 · Stay anonymous
Goes live after moderation, usually within 24h.
🎁 Your first review unlocks 3 bonus interview questions.
Company facts
A logistics firm providing express delivery and value-added services for e-commerce, covering over 2,500 cities in India with a focus on customer satisfaction.
- CEO
- Abhishek Bansal
- Founded
- 2015
- Employees
- 4,472+
- In India
- 4472
- Type
- Public · Logistics
Similar companies
This free snapshot
- ✓ 7 rating categories
- ✓ Industry benchmark
- ✓ Real interview questions
Your Company Game Plan · free account
- 🔒 Verdict for YOUR profile
- 🔒 Live Shadowfax openings
- 🔒 Full question bank + prep plan
Compare with similar Logistics companies
Ratings combine verified public employee-review sources with reviews submitted on PrepNPlaced · refreshed nightly · Report incorrect data